The
matters surrounding the 2016 appropriation bill indicated that Nigerian economy
challenges goes beyond the crumbling crude oil prices.
Budget
which is the estimation of expected income and proposed expenditure for a stated
period of time (usually, for a year) is an important document required for the
smooth operation of an entity; businesses, governments and households need
budget for executing their projects/programmes.
Nigeria’s
budget ought to have been debated and passed for implementation as of today but
the issue surrounding the whole procedures of national budgeting in Nigeria has
been matter of great concern to Nigerians who are hoping to benefit from the
budget implementation.
First were the incorrect figures going
about on the media giving amount of the proposed budget even when the final
tally of such allocations was still being compiled by the Ministry of Budget
and Economic Planning.
It wasn’t long after President Muhammadu
Buhari presented a budget estimate of N6.08 trillion on December 29th,
2015 to a joint sitting of the National Assembly that other worrisome issues
followed.
The 2016 budget proposal was reported to
have gone missing from the premises of the National Assembly. The development
was reportedly announced by Senate Leader Ali Ndume as Senators gathered to
begin the consideration of the budget on January 12th, 2016.
Earlier rumours had it that the budget
had been withdrawn by the Presidency and replaced with another but the
Presidency dismissed reports that President Muhammadu Buhari withdrew the 2016
budget.
The Senior Special Assistant to the
President on Media and Publicity, Mallam Garba Shehu made the clarification on
January 12th.
He said the National Assembly should be
held responsible for the missing document as it ceases to be a property of the
Presidency once it has been presented to the upper chambers.
"Nobody, except the president, can
withdraw the budget. As far as we know, he (the president) has not done that.
The copies in their hundreds have been delivered to both chambers of the
National Assembly.
"By tradition, once the budget is
submitted, it ceases to be our property.
Enquiries as to where it is should be directed to the appropriate
quarters", Shehu said.
Ndume said after the initial claim of
missing budget that ''The budget cannot be missing. A copy can be laid, it is a
symbolic copy, the budget will be in custody of both Chambers. It cannot be stolen,
it cannot be missing.
Once the budget is laid in the National
Assembly, it has become the property of National Assembly.”
When asked the reason for Senate President‘s
visits to the Villa, immediately news of the missing budget broke, Ndume said
‘‘Saraki’s visit to Villa is for Senate to know the President's priority.
We want to see how we can fast track the
passage of the budget before the end of February. What is before the Senate is
proposal, once the president signs it, it cannot be amended, we can turn the
budget upside down, it cannot be missing.”
But the Senate President later after
denial confirmed the development in a response to a point of order by Senator
Eyinanya Abaribe on the alleged missing budget during plenary session on
Wednesday.
Following the confirmation, the Senate
has reportedly set up a committee to look into and search for the missing 2016
National Budget yesterday 13th January for report to be submitted
today.
What we have now is that the Senate
President Bukola Saraki today Thursday 14th January accused the
Presidency of submitting two versions of the 2016 Appropriation Bill to the
National Assembly.
“Today, the Senate received the report
of the ad hoc committee setup to investigate the claims of the missing budget 2016.
“The report of the committee revealed
that the Senate received two versions of the 2016 Appropriation Bill – one from
President Muhammadu Buhari at the December 22nd, 2015 Joint Session of the
National Assembly, and another from the Senior Special Assistant to the
President on National Assembly Matters (Senate), Ita Enang,” Saraki said.
The Senate President further said the
Senate will only accept the version of the appropriation bill that was
presented by the President.
The question is, who is fooling who
and why?
Correct question to ask Michael.
ReplyDeleteThey are fooling theirselves, I wonder why they should.
😀
Delete