Background and Rationale for Diversification of Nigeria Economy towards Sustainable Economic Development
The economic standpoint of Nigeria,
Africa’s largest economy appears gloomy as the result of the current record
fall in international oil prices since 2004 with little or no indication of a
rapid bounce back in the nearest future. The present unpalatable economic
circumstance Nigeria economy finds itself now need urgent and real economic diversification
policy strategies.
The real economic problem in Nigeria
is not declining oil prices (superficially, it may seem so), the real issue is
that, high oil prices have always covered and contributed to the main problem
now bringing the country to the verge of economic collapse.
As we may recall, Nigerian economy
have enjoyed several economic prosperity resulting from oil booms in the
1970s, 1980s and even recently in 2014 when bent crude was sold for USD 110 per
barrel. The current oil price slump is not an entirely new experience to
Nigeria as the country has been through similar situation in the past. In 2008,
oil prices fell to as low as USD 38 per barrel. Brent crude price declined by
over 40% from USD 110 and floated around USD 65 per barrel in June 2014. The
fall continued through 2015 to where we are today with the price slowly crawling
up at USD 50.52 as at 6th June, 2016.
As a matter of urgency, Nigeria
government must encourage the diversification of the Nigeria economy; and not
just in any random areas but in livestock sub-sector specifically as this is
the only sustainable way to survive the recurrent situation of global economic
uncertainty from over dependence on crude oil revenue often faced by Nigeria.
It is crucial for Nigeria government and the general public to not believe that
crude oil provides a never-ending source of foreign exchange and revenue
generation for the required sustainable economic development in Nigeria.
The above therefore necessitated the
suggestion for diversification of the Nigeria economy in agriculture sector,
particularly in the livestock sub-sector; and specifically, in the poultry,
piggery, fishery and cattle production sub-sectors.
Diversification into these
sub-sectors has loads of benefit to Nigeria. It will enable the country to
maximally employ her abundant resource base in rebuilding the economy and enjoy
the benefits of all the linkages and synergies, economies of scales, develop
national technologies and foreign investment profiles, build human capitals,
exploit new opportunities, lessen averagely operational costs, increase
national competitiveness and grow the standard of living and self-reliance of
the citizens for national economy revival.
In
discussing the statement of the research problem, studies of economic histories provide
us with generous evidences that an agricultural revolution is an essential
pre-requisite for sustainable economic development.
The above fact is valid bearing in
mind that, the industrial revolution of the Nineteenth century which catapulted
most agrarian economies of Europe to industrialized nations got their stimuli from
agriculture. Indeed, the importance of the agricultural sector in any country
(like Nigeria) pursuing sustainable economic development cannot be over
emphasized.
The central statement of the problem
of this research work and of course the series of blog posts that shall follow is
that, even though there have been reported cases of general decline in the
contribution of agricultural sector to sustainable economic development in
Nigeria, the livestock sub-sector (specifically) has the potential of serving
as the industrial and economic launch pad from which sustainable economic
development the country can take off.
The continuous falling trends in the
contribution of the agriculture sector to Gross Domestic Product in Nigeria, in
other words does not include poultry, piggery, fishery and cattle production
livestock sub-sectors. These livestock sub-sectors can therefore serve as some
of the few highly effective and efficient agriculture sub-sectors in achieving
the quest for sustainable economic development in Nigeria.
The main objective of the series of
posts is to assess the role of the selected livestock (cattle, poultry, piggery
and fishery) sub-sectors’ contribution to sustainable economic development in
Nigeria.
Other specific objectives of the
research are: to identify the role of poultry, fishery, piggery and cattle
production sub-sectors in sustaining economic development in Nigeria; to
discuss the prospects, challenges and possible solutions to factors determine
production in the selected sub-sectors; to prove from empirical evidence
whether the said decline in the contribution of the agricultural sector to
Gross Domestic Product (sustainable economic development) in Nigeria includes
the poultry, fishery, piggery and cattle production sub-sectors or not; and
lastly, to determine the selected livestock sub-sectors’ contribution to
sustainable economic development between the period under study.
In an attempt to achieve the above
general and specific goals, the research strives to answer the following
questions and even more: What are the roles of the livestock sub-sector,
specifically, poultry, fishery, piggery and cattle production sub-sectors in
sustaining economic development in Nigeria? What are the prospects, challenges
and possible solutions to poultry, fishery, piggery and cattle production in
sustainable economic development in Nigeria?
Can we say that, the said decline
in the contribution of the livestock sub-sectors to Gross Domestic Product in
Nigeria include the contribution of the poultry, fishery, piggery and cattle
production sub-sectors? Can the fore mention livestock sub-sectors
drive the Nigeria livestock sector towards contributing to achieving
sustainable economic development? What are the roles of the Nigerian government
and other stakeholders have to play in improving and sustaining the
contribution of livestock sub-sector to sustainable economic development? What
is the livestock production between the periods under study?
The significance
of the study is anchored on the fact that agriculture is considered a catalyst for the overall
development of any nation. This has made many economic development theories and
economists distinguished the sector as one of the cannot-do-without segment of
production system in achieving sustainable economic development.
Wilber & Jameson (1992)
acknowledged and concord with this fact and wrote, ―The hope for technical change in agriculture and green revolution
suggested that agriculture could be the dynamo for sustainable economic growth
and development.
The industrial revolution of the
Nineteenth century which catapulted the agrarian economies of most developed
countries of the world like Britain, United State of America, France etc today in
fact got their stimuli from agriculture. The sector in recent history has also
worked a tremendous miracle in countries like Mexico, India, Brazil, Peru, Philippines
and China.
Diversifying into the agriculture
sector and specifically into the livestock sub-sector in light of the above background
and rationale is therefore suggested for Nigeria as a developing economy to
ensure food and nutritional security, income equality, unemployment reduction,
poverty alleviation, industrialization advancement, ease pressure on balance of
payment, reliable source of government revenue and overall economic development
of the country.
Nigeria should diversify into the
agriculture sector as a developing country to speed up the rate and increase
the chances of achieving sustainable economic development, since it a proven
fact that, the more developed a country is, the lower the contribution of
agriculture to Gross Domestic Product.
The study
like any other study was confronted with some limitations ranging from the fact
that Gross
Domestic Product (GDP) was used to measure Sustainable Economic Development even
though it does not to some extent reflect the true economic transformation of a
country and does have some limitation due to the difficulties associated with
measuring economic development and lack of generally acceptable consensus
standard of measuring sustainable economic development ranging from Measure of
Economic Welfare (MEW), Genuine Progress Indicator (GPI) to Gross Domestic
Product (GDP) and couple with dearth of available Human Development Index (HDI)
in Nigeria.
The above approach was nevertheless
used since there exists correlation between Measure of Economic Welfare (MEW)
and Gross Domestic Product and can thus be considered as a sub-sect of Measure
of Economic Welfare.
Another limitation of the study was
the disjointed, incomplete and non-availability of single and comprehensive
data (document) with regard to the contribution of poultry, fishery, piggery
and cattle production to livestock sub-sector.
The above limitation necessitated
the gathering of secondary data from various publications ranging from Central
Bank of Nigeria bulletins, National Bureau of Statistics publications, Ministry
of Agriculture etc. the data gathered expands from 1982-2014.
We shall in our next blog post be reviewing
theoretical and empirical literatures related to the research.
Cite
as follows: Dan-Abu Michael Ngbede, (2016). Appraisal
of the Role of Cattle, Poultry, Piggery and Fishery Sub-Sectors to Sustainable
Economic Development in Nigeria: 1982-2014. A research project submitted to
the department of Economics, University of Jos, Plateau state, Nigeria in
partial fulfilment of the requirement for the award of Bachelor of Science (B.
Sc) in Economics.
Comments
Post a Comment
Be free to make your comment!